0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ°³ º´¿ø ½ÅÀÔ°£È£»çÀÇ ±âº»½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ÇнÀ°æÇè, Áö½Ä ¹× ¼öÇà´É·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Learning Experience, Knowledge, and Performance in Newly Graduated Nurses

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 18±Ç 2È£ p.201 ~ 209
KMID : 0388320110180020201
õ¼±Èñ ( Chun Sun-Hee ) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

¿ÀÀ±Èñ (  ) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì ¿î¿µÆÀ
±è¼º¼ö ( Kim Sung-Soo ) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ÀÇ·áÁ¤º¸¿î¿µÆÀ

Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning experience, knowledge, and performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in newly graduated nurses, and to identify differences related to learning experience.

Methods:The participants were 114 new nurses in the hospital. They were asked to complete a questionnaire, which included CPR learning experience. They were evaluated by a written test and a skill test using a manikin and check list.

Results:All participants attended CPR lectures and underwent practice while in university. Only 12.28% of participants were taught by a certified Basic Life Support (BLS) instructor. The mean scores of the written and skill tests were and , respectively. The nurses lacked CPR knowledge related to checking breathing, the frequency of 30 chest compressions, compression rate, and automated external defibrillator use. They also lacked skill in performing CPR related to checking breathing and pulse and giving 2 breaths. CPR performance differed according to learning time (p=.047) and BLS educator (p=.029).

Conclusion:The findings of this study reveal that CPR performance by newly graduated nurses is poor and suggest that CPR education by trained instructors, practice-based education, and reeducation programs must be provided to newly graduated nurses in the hospital.
KeyWords
±âº»½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú, ÇнÀ°æÇè, Áö½Ä, ¼öÇà´É·Â
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Learning experience, Knowledge, Performance
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed